AE to 25.42% for MAE. Also, there was very less difference in the yield of MAE and UAME extracted pectin, but at the cost of major difference in degree of esterification 59.76 ± 0.70 and 73.33 ± 1.76%, respectively. In addition, all the pectin extracted under optimized conditions was having acceptable purity, [Galacturonic acid (GalA) content ranged from 675.8 ± 11.31 to 913.3 ± 20.50 g/kg of pectin]. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of functional groups in the finger print region of identification for polysaccharide in all the extracted pectin. According to obtained results, UAME can be considered as better green extraction technology in terms of extraction yield as well as in quality of pectin compared to the other treatments used. Therefore, results suggest that UAME can be used as an efficient pectin extraction method from tomato processing waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sengar et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: