PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2016Judgment and Decision Making16 citationsOpen Access

Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring

AHAdam J. L. HarrisMSMaarten Speekenbrink

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Anchoring effects are robust, varied and can be consequential. Researchers have provided a variety of alternative explanations for these effects. More recently, it has become apparent that anchoring effects might be produced by a variety of different processes, either acting simultaneously, or else individually in distinct situations. An unresolved issue is whether anchoring, aside from simple numeric priming, can transcend scales. That is, is it necessary that the anchor value and the target judgment are expressed in the same units? Despite some theoretical predictions to the contrary, this paper demonstrates semantic cross-scale anchoring in four experiments. Such effects are important for the direction of future theorising on the causes of anchoring effects and understanding the scope of their consequences in applied domains.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harris et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a032f1cf1675f581a756a5dhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500004782
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Anchoring in sequential judgments2013 · 89 citations
  2. 2Anchoring unbound2010 · 68 citations
  3. 3The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks.2000 · 159 citations
  4. 4A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents.1996 · 608 citations
  5. 5The anchor integration model: A descriptive model of anchoring effects2016 · 84 citations