In this article, we provide a typology of mixed analysis techniques, namely the Mixed Analysis Matrix, that helps researchers select a data analysis technique given the number of (a) data types collected (i.e. quantitative or qualitative; or quantitative and qualitative) and (b) analysis types used (i.e. quantitative or qualitative; or quantitative and qualitative)—yielding a 2 X 2 representation involving four cells that each contain specific analytical techniques, with two of these cells containing a total of 15 mixed analysis techniques. Furthermore, we describe the fundamental principle of mixed analysis, describe the steps in a mixed analysis, and delineate the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed analyses. For each technique, readers are directed to published studies that serve as illustrative examples. Outlining the mixed-analysis techniques available for researchers hopefully will increase awareness of the number of choices for analyzing data from mixed studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onwuegbuzie et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: