Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
One of the great debates about extinction is whether humans or climatic change caused the demise of the Pleistocene megafauna. Evidence from paleontology, climatology, archaeology, and ecology now supports the idea that humans contributed to extinction on some continents, but human hunting was not solely responsible for the pattern of extinction everywhere. Instead, evidence suggests that the intersection of human impacts with pronounced climatic change drove the precise timing and geography of extinction in the Northern Hemisphere. The story from the Southern Hemisphere is still unfolding. New evidence from Australia supports the view that humans helped cause extinctions there, but the correlation with climate is weak or contested. Firmer chronologies, more realistic ecological models, and regional paleoecological insights still are needed to understand details of the worldwide extinction pattern and the population dynamics of the species involved.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anthony D. Barnosky
University of California, Berkeley
Paul L. Koch
University of California, Santa Cruz
Robert S. Feranec
New York State Museum
Science
University of California, Santa Cruz
Smithsonian Institution
National Museum of Natural History
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barnosky et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0363205cff52091a9bd155 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101476
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: