Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since the first shape-from-shading (SFS) technique was developed by Horn in the early 1970s, many different approaches have emerged. In this paper, six well-known SFS algorithms are implemented and compared. The performance of the algorithms was analyzed on synthetic images using mean and standard deviation of depth (Z) error, mean of surface gradient (p, q) error, and CPU timing. Each algorithm works well for certain images, but performs poorly for others. In general, minimization approaches are more robust, while the other approaches are faster.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: