Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To develop an adaptable gene-based vector that will confer immune cell specificity to various cancer types. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Human and mouse T cells were genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that binds a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) molecule, termed anti-FITC CAR T cells. Various antibodies (Ab) currently in clinical use including cetuximab (Ctx), trastuzumab (Her2), and rituximab (Rtx) were conjugated with FITC and tested for their ability to bind tumor cells, activate T cells, and induce antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: Anti-FITC CAR T cells recognize various cancer types when bound with FITC-labeled Abs resulting in efficient target lysis, T-cell proliferation, and cytokine/chemokine production. The treatment of immunocompromised mice with human anti-FITC CAR T cells plus FITC-labeled cetuximab (FITC-Ctx) delayed the growth of colon cancer but unexpectedly led to the outgrowth of EGF receptor (EGFR)-negative tumor cells. On the other hand, in a human pancreatic cancer cell line with uniform EGFR expression, anti-FITC CAR T cells plus FITC-Ctx eradicated preestablished late-stage tumors. In immunocompetent mice, anti-FITC CAR T cells exhibited potent antitumor activity against syngeneic mouse breast cancer expressing Her2 and B-cell lymphoma expressing CD20 by combining with FITC-Her2 and FITC-Rtx, respectively. In addition, the activity of anti-FITC CAR T cells could be attenuated by subsequent injections of nonspecific FITC-IgG. CONCLUSION: These studies highlight an applicability of anti-tag CAR technology to treat patients with different types of cancers and a possibility to regulate CAR T-cell functions with competing FITC molecules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamada et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: