Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is shown that the equilibrium in the asymmetric two-player Tullock contest is unique for parameter values r≤2. This allows proving a revenue ranking result saying that a revenue-maximizing designer capable of biasing the contest always prefers a technology with higher r.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian Ewerhart (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: