Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this article is to overview various challenges that prospective authors of quality systematic reviews should be prepared to address. These challenges pertain to all phases of the review process: from posing a critical question worthy of pursuit and executing a search procedure that is appropriately framed and transparently recorded, to discerning patterns and trends within the resulting data that speak directly to the critical question framing the review. For each of these challenges, suggestions are offered as to how authors might respond so as to enhance the quality of the review process and increase the value of findings for educational research, practice, and policymaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia A. Alexander (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: