Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simon's two-stage designs are very popular for phase II clinical trials. A literature review revealed that the inference procedures used with Simon's designs almost always ignore the actual sampling plan used. Reported P-values, point estimates and confidence intervals for the response rate are not usually adjusted for the design's adaptiveness. In addition, we found that the actual sample size for the second stage is often different from that planned. We present here a method for inferences using both the planned and the actual sample sizes. The conventional and the preferred inference procedures usually yield similar P-values and confidence intervals for the response rate. The conventional inference, however, may contradict the result of the corresponding hypothesis testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koyama et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: