Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measurements of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) over several solar cycles do not agree with computed values of open magnetic flux from potential field extrapolations. The discrepancy becomes greater around solar maximum in each cycle when the IMF can be twice as strong as predicted by the potential field model. Here we demonstrate that this discrepancy may be resolved by allowing for electric currents in the low corona (below 2.5 R ⊙ ). We present a quasi‐static numerical model of the large‐scale coronal magnetic evolution, which systematically produces these currents through flux emergence and shearing by surface motions. The open flux is increased by 75%–85% at solar maximum, but only 25% at solar minimum, bringing it in line with estimates from IMF measurements. The additional open flux in the nonpotential model arises through inflation of the magnetic field by electric currents, with superimposed fluctuations due to coronal mass ejections. The latter are modeled by the self‐consistent ejection of twisted magnetic flux ropes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeates et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: