Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis of statistical data reveals elements of digital infrastructure impact regional governments.
The object of this study is the digital infrastructure of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The subject of the study is the structural interrelations between the elements of digital infrastructure within the regional context. The methodological framework comprises a systems approach to analyzing infrastructure as a multilevel phenomenon, a comparative analysis of statistical data from the Ministry of Digital Development of the Russian Federation for 2022–2023, and a case study method for an in-depth examination of practices in three types of regions: a metropolitan region (Moscow), a digitalization leader (Tatarstan), and a typical agrarian region (Kursk Oblast). Practical recommendations are developed for federal authorities, regional governments, and the business community aimed at optimizing the architecture of digital infrastructure, taking into account the specific characteristics of different types of regions. An integrative model of regional digital infrastructure is proposed, encompassing structural, spatial, institutional, and technological sovereignty components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakovleva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: