Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational cohort study shows frailty measures predict discharge delays and mortality in TAVI patients, indicating risk factors for decision making.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the principal treatment for aortic stenosis in older and high-risk patients. Whilst important in holistic decision making, frailty indices vary in ease of use, objectivity, and accuracy. We assess prognostic ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT) in predicting delayed discharge and 1-year mortality following TAVI. Methods: Prospective, single centre, observational cohort study of patients undergoing TAVI at a tertiary centre in the UK from 2020-2022. Clinical characteristics, CFS, and EFT were collected pre-procedurally. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay following TAVI and mortality at 1- year post-procedure. Generalized regression with elastic net is used to assess the additive discriminative ability of frailty scores to predict outcomes. Stepwise regression is used to identify informative outcome predictors. Results: non-femoral) significantly improved prediction of delayed discharge. Conclusions: EFT informs decision making on survival 1-year post-TAVI, beyond conventional measures. Use of non-femoral access site and high CFS are the best predictors of delayed discharge. Surgical risk stratification scores poorly predict medium-term TAVI survival and delayed discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: