PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2026Journal of Philosophy of Education0 citations

Against teaching propositional belief in higher education and the World Religions Paradigm

View Full Paper
MMMichael Hubbard MacKayBrigham Young UniversitySYStephen YancharBrigham Young University

Key Points

  • This article critiques the World Religions Paradigm and explores alternatives to teaching propositional belief in higher education.
  • Analyzes issues within the World Religions Paradigm
  • Compares propositional belief with faith
  • Utilizes neo-Heideggerian thought
  • Proposes adjustments to current teaching practices
  • Advocates for a practice-oriented alternative to propositional belief
  • Emphasizes the importance of lived religious experience
  • Suggests that adjustments to the World Religions Paradigm are possible rather than a complete overhaul

Abstract

Abstract This article outlines some problems inherent in the World Religions Paradigm and focuses on the problem of teaching propositional belief. By comparing belief to faith, this article suggests that teaching World Religions in higher education can be done without propositional belief and through a practice-oriented alternative. Using one line of thought in the philosophy of education, this article argues that teachers can adjust the World Religions Paradigm, rather than getting rid of it all together. This adjustment is based on Wrathall’s neo-Heideggerian argument that praxis-oriented faith and lived religious experience should be fundamental to World Religions in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

MacKay et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03cbbe1c527af8f1ecf8cahttps://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhag010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper