This analysis compares structural performance of aluminium alloys in load-bearing frames, revealing implications for additive manufacturing applications.
Indisputably, the evolution of innovative manufacturing methods such as additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing in the last decade has started gradually to influence the construction field, offering significant benefit potential, particularly in the field of metallic materials. In the case of aluminium alloys, the implementation of the wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) method, an AM sub-type, has recently emerged as a promising alternative to conventional rolling and extrusion, enabling unprecedented geometric flexibility, lower energy demand, and reduced tooling costs. However, the selection of an appropriate feedstock alloy poses a major challenge, as inherent trade-offs between strength, ductility, and printing-induced anisotropy arise. In this context, this study presents a thorough multi-scale numerical investigation, spanning from the cross-sectional to the global structural scale. The structural performance of several two-story moment-resisting frames was evaluated, comparing frames featuring WAAM-fabricated columns against conventional extruded and rolled benchmarks. The assessment included three 3D-printed alloys (Al-Mg, Al-Cu, Al-Mg-Si), differing in ductility levels, featuring topology-optimized and internal lattice-reinforced cross-sectional geometries. Linear elastic analyses reveal that global lateral stiffness heavily governs the response of slender frames, where WAAM was able to efficiently decrease the corresponding inter-story drifts by maximizing cross-sectional inertia without necessitating the utilization of larger external member dimensions. Furthermore, nonlinear static (pushover) analyses provided valuable insight into critical design considerations, exposing a profound strength-ductility trade-off in printed aluminium alloy load-bearing members.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Efthymiou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: