Multicenter analysis revealed moderate inter-rater reliability for lymphovascular invasion in endometrial cancer, suggesting need for clearer cutoff guidelines.
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a prognostic and treatment-driving parameter for low-stage, low-grade endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEAC). There is lack of organizational recommendations/guideline consensus regarding the clinically significant cutoff and pathologist agreement on cutoff thresholds has not been extensively studied. Digitized unannotated tumor-containing slides from 52 low-grade/uterine corpus-confined EEAC of no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) molecular subgroups were reviewed by 6 gynecologic pathologists. The reviewers, blinded to the originally reported LVI status, independently evaluated for the presence of LVI and the maximum number of involved vessels in a single slide or slides, per case. To quantify inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated (ICC<0.5=poor, 0.5 to 0.75=moderate, and 0.75 to 0.9=good and >0.9=excellent). A total of 280 slides were evaluated. The overall inter-rater reliability for the presence of LVI was moderate (ICC=0.53) and was slightly higher in the MMRd (ICC=0.56) compared with NSMP (ICC=0.52) group. For specific quantification of LVI, the overall inter-rater reliability was also moderate (ICC=0.71) and higher in the MMRd (ICC=0.76) compared with NSMP (ICC=0.69) group. Perfect agreement (6/6 reviewers with same assessment) only occurred for designations of no LVI or ≥5 involved vessels. There was a moderate level of inter-rater reliability that was not significantly affected by shifting the cutoff of involved vessels (from 3 to 4 to 5). Since a specific cutoff has no apparent bearing on the most reproducible cutoff for pathologists, future efforts should be directed towards obtaining clinical consensus for reporting purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: