Retrospective review indicates tracheostomy is essential for laryngeal dyspnoea in patients, suggesting effective risk management and technique mastery.
Introduction: Tracheostomy is the opening of the cervical trachea followed by the placement of a cannula. It is intended to provide a short circuit of the upper airway. The aim of this study is to review the indications for tracheostomy. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 43 tracheotomized patients treated in the otorhinolaryngology department of Gabriel University Hospital. Toure de Bamako for a period of 6 years from January 2017 to August 2024. Results: The work involved 27 men (62.8%) and 16 women (37.2%), with a sex ratio of 1.69. The mean age of the patients was 38.295 years with extremes of 2.67 and 77 years. Laryngeal dyspnoea (n= 28) and dysphonia (n=26) were the main symptoms of consultation. Most tracheostomies were performed as an emergency procedure in 79.1% of cases (n=34), with scheduled tracheostomies performed in 20.9% of cases (n=9). The conditions requiring tracheostomy were dominated by malignant tumours of the larynx and pharynx (26.4%), followed by post-thyroidectomy recurrent paralysis (7.9%), trauma to the larynx (10.5%) and penetrating neck wounds (4.7%). Laryngeal papillomatosis was the main indication in children (4 children). The technique used was classical surgical tracheotomy, often performed under general anaesthesia (53.5%) and under local anaesthesia in emergency cases (46.5%). The skin incision was transverse in most cases (n=38) (88.4%) and vertical in 11.6% (n=5). Complications related to tracheostomy were diverse, generally benign, and occurred in 1% of cases. Mortality occurred in 3 of our patients whose cannulas were still in place, a rate of 8.1% (n=3). Conclusion: Whatever the indication, tracheostomy is a life-saving procedure whose usefulness and effectiveness are certain. Mastery of the technique, rigorous monitoring and postoperative care are the main conditions for minimising the risk of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siaka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: