Evaluation method reveals that effective mitigation schemes enhance power quality in charging stations for vehicles, suggesting renewable energy benefits.
To address the power quality deterioration caused by the large-scale integration of grid-following (GFL) electric vehicle charging stations, this paper proposes a comprehensive assessment method based on relative entropy distance fusion weighting and a dynamic ideal solution VIKOR algorithm. First, a multi-dimensional power quality evaluation system is constructed, focusing on key indicators such as voltage deviation, frequency deviation, three-phase imbalance, and harmonic distortion, to accommodate the operational characteristics of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) under grid-following and grid-forming (GFM) interaction scenarios. Building on this, the three-scale analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed to determine subjective weights, while the divergence-maximized entropy weight method is used to derive objective weights. The relative entropy distance model is then applied to achieve adaptive fusion of subjective and objective weights, resulting in an optimal combined weighting. Subsequently, a dynamic ideal solution mechanism is introduced into the VIKOR algorithm, where the range of the ideal solution is adjusted based on the indicator weights to enhance the discrimination of key indicators. By comprehensively calculating the group utility value, individual regret value, and compromise evaluation index, accurate ranking and performance assessment of different mitigation schemes are achieved. Using measured data from a vehicle-grid interaction demonstration base for analysis, the results demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively quantify the actual effects of various mitigation schemes, providing decision-making support for power grid safety and stability under high penetration of renewable energy and converter-interfaced generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: