Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary This study considered the complexity of Mishrif geology and its effect on fluid movement within and across Mishrif reservoir intervals. For this purpose, we analyzed the following items: the multiple interval communication with high permeability contrast, the geological setting of the upper Mishrif (mA) interval, the channel structure in the Lower Mishrif-Part 1 (mB1) interval, the thin layers in the upper part of Lower Mishrif-Part 2 (mB2U) of very high permeability, and the microporous interval of the lower part of Lower Mishrif-Part 2 (mB2L); none of them were well defined before this work. The bottom interval of Mishrif or Rumaila (mC) is predominantly microporous, and the best reservoir is at the top of intermediate quality. Two high-porosity layers are systematically found in the mC unit, which is casually referred to as “rabbit ears.” The mB2L contains grainstones in the far north of the West Qurna/1 oil field (WQ1). In the south of mB2L, some of the toe sets from the clinoforms in a distal depositional setting have developed into rather important vertical pressure baffles and barriers to vertical flow. The mB2U generally consists of grainstones with thin streaks of mudstone high flow layers (HFLs), and the rocks underneath are described generally as grainstone shoals. About 80% of stock tank oil originally in place (STOOIP) in mB2U exists in grainstones. There are no known microporous reservoirs in mB2U. The pressure difference across the boundaries between mB1 and mA can be positive or negative. At the base, mB1 channels are always in pressure communication with the mB2U below. The best flow from the mA comes from HFLs, which are found around faults. Reservoir quality within mA is generally best in the first section of the upper Mishrif (mAa), and the majority of STOOIP in mA exists in microporous rocks, while some 30% of STOOIP is contained in grainstones.
Al-Dujaili et al. (Thu,) studied this question.