Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous tests for aggregation of organisms among sampling units that vary in size and tests for size-based sample-unit selection fail to account for variation in the size of the sample unit. When sample units vary in size, tests that assume equal-sized sample units overestimate the degree of aggregation and have a tendency to find selection for large-sized sample units. Previous tests for selection of large or small leaves by phytophagous insects have been biased toward detecting selection for large leaves when no leaf selection or selection for small leaves may actually be present, and toward detecting aggregation even when populations are Poisson random or repulsed. We derive explicitly the population mean and variance of the number of organisms per sample unit when the size of the sample unit is random, and we outline procedures to estimate the degree of aggregation and test for size-based sample-unit selection using a generalized linear model based on a Poisson null hypothesis of independent random placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Connor et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: