PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2026Acta PsychologicaOpen Access

Steiner's trinitarian view and the philosophy of mind: A critique of Kuhn's landscape of consciousness taxonomy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TSTerje SparbyTETorbjørn EftestølMLMarkus Lindholm

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial critiques the classification of Steiner's philosophy of mind, suggesting a need for taxonomic revision.

Key Points

  • The aim is to challenge Kuhn's classification of Steiner's philosophy of mind as dualism and propose a trinitarian view instead.
  • Critically analyze Kuhn's taxonomy of philosophies of mind regarding Steiner's classification.
  • Compare Steiner's view with other philosophers like Whitehead and de Chardin to explore implications for taxonomy.
  • Examine how the trinitarian perspective addresses the hard problem of consciousness.
  • Steiner's philosophy is better represented as a unification of monism and dualism.
  • Kuhn's taxonomy is suggested to have limitations based on its binary classification.
  • The trinitarian model may offer new insights into philosophy of mind, particularly concerning consciousness.

Cite This Study

Sparby et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04141c79e20c90b44444f0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107015
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share