Assesses hydraulic performance of extraction wells in low-permeability sites, suggesting strategies for improved sustainability.
Subsurface contamination at low-permeability petrochemical sites necessitates long-term multi-phase extraction (MPE), yet operational sustainability is frequently compromised by well-bore clogging. This study develops a “prevent–identify–remediate” strategy through integrated laboratory and field-based investigations. Laboratory bench tests identified a critical packing density threshold of 70%, above which permeability loss escalates rapidly. Furthermore, rounded quartz sand maintained a significantly higher permeability ratio (0.4) compared to irregular zeolite (0.1). These findings were validated through a longitudinal two-year field pilot study in a silty-clay formation. Innovative large-diameter wells (200 mm) utilising optimised quartz sand showed high resilience, with only a 20% reduction in discharge capacity over 24 months. In contrast, conventional wells using local yellow sand exhibited severe physical clogging, resulting in a 57% decrease in stable flow. The study also characterised a diameter effect, where small-diameter wells (63 mm) proved inherently more vulnerable to rapid performance degradation regardless of filter media. To address existing impairment, high-pressure water jetting and dilute hydrochloric acid washing restored flow capacity by 50% and 40%, respectively. By coupling mechanistic insights with field evidence, this research provides a comprehensive platform for the sustainable design and maintenance of subsurface remediation infrastructure, ensuring long-term operational efficiency and reduced resource consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: