Empirical study evaluates human-AI co-creation's impact on learning effectiveness, highlighting engagement roles in Gen Z.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of human-AI co-creation on learning effectiveness and to assess the intermediary role of Engagement, Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Co-creation. A survey instrument was employed in this empirical study, designed by combining Self-Determination Theory, Connectivism, and Constructivism. The data was collected through a questionnaire from 415 Gen Z adults. PLS-SEM technique was used to carry out quantitative analysis. The results pointed out a significant association between students’ psychological need satisfaction and Cognitive Engagement, with the effect of Perceived Autonomy and Perceived Competence evenly balanced, while Perceived Relatedness wielded a stronger influence on Cognitive Engagement. The findings also unveiled that AI interaction quality had a better influence on Cognitive engagement compared to Trust in AI and perceived agency of AI. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a significant positive impact of Cognitive Engagement on the development of thinking skills. This consequently influenced knowledge co-creation, ultimately leading to enhanced learning effectiveness. This study has implications for educational setups and training organizations to adopt Gen AI for co-creation, and guides policymakers in designing relevant policies to responsibly use Gen AI for co-creation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhanya Pramod (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: