Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates signal quality of PPG across body sites, suggesting alternative monitoring locations.
Reflective-mode photoplethysmography (PPG) potentially enables non-invasive physiological monitoring of heart rate and Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) from virtually any anatomical body site, but its performances are strongly affected by several parameters such as local perfusion, skin temperature, and microvascular bed and tissue optical properties. This study systematically evaluates the quality of reflective-mode PPG signals acquired at the finger, wrist, ear, nose, temple, upper lip, and lower lip, using two commercial PPG sensors. PPG signal quality was quantified via Skewness, Kurtosis, Perfusion Index, and Shannon entropy. Heart rate (HR) and pulse transit time (PTT) were also computed. Skewness and Perfusion Index were the most informative quality indices, revealing the finger as the site with the best signal quality and the wrist as the most challenging location. Several facial regions—including the lips, nose, and temple—showed signal quality comparable to the finger. HR estimation was most accurate using the GREEN wavelength, with the lower lip achieving the lowest error, followed by the upper lip and finger. PTT values reflected physiological differences in pulse propagation, being longest at the finger and wrist and shortest at the lips. These findings highlight the potential of non-conventional anatomical sites as alternatives to the finger and wrist for reflective-mode PPG acquisition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: