Key result
Intense physical activity linked to a ~90% drop in good quality PPG pulses.
Why the study?
Multiple uncontrolled sources of variability can hamper the clinical application of photoplethysmographic signals in pervasive monitoring contexts.
Observational (n=31)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 94%
p-value: p=<0.001
Physical activity and health state significantly impact the quality and waveform parameters of PPG signals from wearable devices, highlighting the need to account for these variables in pervasive monitoring.
Activity impairs wearable PPG quality; leaves open whether adjusted algorithms can enable reliable pervasive monitoring.
The photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal has been applied in various research fields, with promising results for its future clinical application. However, there are several sources of variability that, if not adequately controlled, can hamper its application in pervasive monitoring contexts. This study assessed and characterized the impact of several sources of variability, such as physical activity, age, sex, and health state on PPG signal quality and PPG waveform parameters (Rise Time, Pulse Amplitude, Pulse Time, Reflection Index, Delta T, and DiastolicAmplitude). We analyzed 31 24 h recordings by as many participants (19 healthy subjects and 12 oncological patients) with a wristband wearable device, selecting a set of PPG pulses labeled with three different quality levels. We implemented a Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) model to evaluate the impact of the aforementioned factors on PPG signal quality. We then extracted six parameters only on higher-quality PPG pulses and evaluated the influence of physical activity, age, sex, and health state on these parameters with Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Models (GLMM). We found that physical activity has a detrimental effect on PPG signal quality quality (94% of pulses with good quality when the subject is at rest vs. 9% during intense activity), and that health state affects the percentage of available PPG pulses of the best quality (at rest, 44% for healthy subjects vs. 13% for oncological patients). Most of the extracted parameters are influenced by physical activity and health state, while age significantly impacts two parameters related to arterial stiffness. These results can help expand the awareness that accurate, reliable information extracted from PPG signals can be reached by tackling and modeling different sources of inaccuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moscato et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy and oncological patients (n=31). Physical activity vs. Rest was evaluated on Good quality PPG pulses (p=<0.001). Physical activity significantly reduced the percentage of good quality photoplethysmography pulses from 94% at rest to 9% during intense activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: