Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper formalizes the Fractal Metascience Paradigm to enhance dynamic visualization, integrating multiple scientific domains.
This paper formalizes the Fractal Metascience Paradigm (FMP) as a corrective to the limitations of static representations in scientific publishing, redefining image, visualization, and representation as processual, recursive, and dynamically observable phenomena. Within FMP, an image is not a picture but an unfolding system; visualization is not depiction but participation in dynamics. We demonstrate that what is conventionally fragmented into mathematics, physics, computer science, and philosophy constitutes a single recursive ontology describable through fractal structures and operational superposition. Furthermore, we show how artificial intelligence systems, when used reflexively, enable the experimental simulation of this superposition regime, providing a unified framework for integrating theory, method, and dynamic visualization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdurashid Abdukarimov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: