This talk conceptualizes data quality assessment as a crucial pre-assessment step in decision support systems, suggesting improved outcomes.
Trustworthy and impactful decision support systems (DSS) critically depend on data that are fit for their intended use. Here, data quality assessments should be understood not merely as a validation step, but as a systematic metadata enrichment process that produces structured, machine-actionable descriptors of data plausibility, and correctness. Building on established data quality concepts in medical research, this talk generically conceptualises data quality assessment as a crucial pre-assessment layer that is analytically distinct from decision logic and compares distinct approaches to handle metadata.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: