Assesses fatigue monitoring in individuals using EEG and advanced algorithms, indicating improved accuracy.
Fatigue seriously affects work efficiency and brings potential safety hazards, and electroencephalogram (EEG) serves as a valuable physiological indicator for fatigue monitoring, as it directly reflects underlying brain neural activity. A key characteristic in EEG fatigue research is that the feature spaces of pre-fatigue and post-fatigue EEG signals exhibit obvious spatial separation—this separation is caused by significant changes in brain electrical activity when the human body transitions from a normal awake state to a fatigue state. Existing EEG-based fatigue judgment methods mostly focus on binary classification, which fails to fully leverage the inherent spatial separation characteristic of pre-fatigue and post-fatigue feature spaces, making it difficult to achieve simple, efficient, and accurate fatigue judgment. To address this problem, this paper proposes an EEG fatigue judgment method based on feature space spatial separation and Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search (ANNS). The 16-channel pre-fatigue (Group A) and post-fatigue (Group B) EEG signals acquired from seven subjects are segmented and subjected to feature extraction, projecting the signals into a unified feature space. An ANNS index is constructed using feature vectors from both Group A and Group B, with each vector annotated by its corresponding class label. A separate test set (Group C) is utilized, and the k-nearest neighbors of each test feature vector are retrieved from the built ANNS index. The mental fatigue state is then identified via majority voting according to the class labels of the k-nearest neighbors. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively exploit the spatial separation between pre-fatigue and post-fatigue feature distributions, yielding an average single-subject classification accuracy of approximately 90%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: