Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines e-cigarette use related to serious psychological distress in adults, suggesting targeted interventions are needed.
BACKGROUND: Compared to adults without serious psychological distress (SPD), adults with SPD have higher e-cigarette use (i.e., nicotine vaping), and both SPD and vaping vary by sexual identity. This study examined whether sexual identity modified the association between SPD and e-cigarette use in a nationally representative US adult sample. METHODS: = 139,524). Logistic regression models of past-month e-cigarette use, including an interaction term between serious psychological distress (measured with Kessler-6; no, yes) and sexual identity (heterosexual/straight, gay/lesbian, bisexual) were estimated, adjusted for survey year, sociodemographics, other tobacco use, and substance use. Moderation was evaluated using regression-based marginal effects. Regression-based marginal effects indicated that SPD was associated with an increased predicted probability of e-cigarette use among heterosexual adults, but not among gay/lesbian or bisexual adults. However, bisexual adults exhibited the highest overall prevalence of e-cigarette use regardless of distress status. CONCLUSIONS: Serious psychological distress was associated with e-cigarette use, but the strength of this association differed by sexual identity. Findings highlight the importance of tailored e-cigarette prevention and cessation programs that recognize heterogeneity in e-cigarette use across sexual identity groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: