Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes how entanglement improves magic injection during quantum computation, suggesting new insights.
Non-stabilizerness is a key resource for fault-tolerant quantum computation, yet its interplay with entanglement in dynamical settings remains underexplored. We address this by analyzing a well-controlled, analytically tractable setup, where we show that entanglement acts as a conduit that teleports magic across the system, thereby enhancing magic injection. Using exact calculations, we prove that when a Haar-random unitary UA is applied to a subsystem A of an entangled stabilizer state, the total injected magic increases with the amount of entanglement between A and its complement. More generally, for any unitary UA, we show that this enhancement is maximized when A is maximally entangled with its complement, in which case the total injected magic is exactly given by the unitary stabilizer Rényi entropy we introduce. This quantity provides both a directly computable measure of unitary magic and a lower bound on the minimum number of T gates required to synthesize UA. In particular, we show that the linear unitary stabilizer entropy gives a better estimate for the nonstabilizer content produced by UA than the previously proposed notion of nonstabilizing power. We further extend our analysis to tripartite stabilizer entanglement, non-stabilizer entanglement, and magic injection via shallow-depth brickwork circuits, finding that the qualitative picture remains unchanged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: