Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines chemical resistance in geopolymer concrete using agricultural wastes, suggesting sustainable building materials.
Interest in geopolymer concrete (GPC) made from agricultural wastes has increased due to the growing demand for environmentally friendly building materials; however, few studies have compared the short-term chemical resistance performance and optimisation of multi-source ash-based systems in harsh environments. The compressive strength, short-term chemical resistance, and optimisation of GPC made from sawdust ash (SDA), cassava peel ash (CPA), and rice husk ash (RHA), all of which have combined SiO₂ and Al2O₃ values greater than 70%, guaranteeing acceptability as aluminosilicate precursors are examined in this work. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used to systematically optimise important processing factors such as activator-to-source ratio, curing temperature, curing duration, and NaOH molarity. An alkaline activator consisting of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide (1:2.5) was utilised. The robustness of the optimisation framework was confirmed by the development and validation of statistically significant predictive models using ANOVA (Adjusted and Predicted R2 > 0.82). For RHA, SDA, and CPA-based GPC, the optimised mixes attained compressive strengths of 25.32 MPa, 24.10 MPa, and 20.44 MPa, respectively. In all harsh settings, the short-term chemical resistance order of RHA > SDA > CPA was verified, with CPA-based systems exhibiting the highest susceptibility (up to 11.9%) and RHA-based geopolymer concrete exhibiting the best short-term chemical resistancewith the lowest strength loss (≈5.9–7.5%). Overall, this study shows that silica-rich RHA-based GPC is a viable and sustainable substitute for structural applications in challenging service conditions by bridging the knowledge gap regarding the combined effects of agro-waste precursors and processing variables on both strength optimisation and short-term chemical resistance performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: