Study optimizes strength and durability in bio-based geopolymer concrete, indicating a sustainable alternative.
This study optimises and evaluates the performance of geopolymer concrete (GPC) produced using biomass ash (BA) and rice husk ash (RHA) sourced from Punjab, India. A Box–Behnken design within the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) framework examined four key variables – BA content (40–60%), RHA content (40–60%), alkaline-to-binder ratio (0.35–0.45) and NaOH molarity (8–12 M) – to assess their effects on mechanical and durability properties. Twenty-nine GPC mixes were tested for strength, permeability and chemical resistance. Statistical analysis identified NaOH molarity as the most influential factor, followed by the A/B ratio and ash proportions. The optimal mix (B50R50A35M12) achieved 29.5 MPa compressive strength, 3.55 MPa split tensile strength, low permeability (5.46% water absorption, 0.057 mm/min0·5 sorptivity, 15.15% porosity, 2430 C RCPT) and enhanced acid (5.69% weight loss) and sulphate resistance (6.51% strength loss), outperforming M30-grade OPC concrete. Microstructural analysis (SEM, XRD, FTIR and TGA) confirmed a dense, well-polymerised sodium aluminosilicate hydrate (N–A–S–H) gel. Cost and life-cycle analyses revealed 25–30% lower cost and up to 70% reduced CO2 emissions. Overall, BA–RHA-based GPC offers a sustainable, high-performance and low-carbon alternative for durable structural applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: