Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates AI-enhanced honeypots for engaging cyber attackers, indicating improved defense effectiveness.
As cyber threats continue to grow in sophistication, the need for intelligent and adaptive defence mechanisms becomes increasingly more critical. This project investigates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into a honeypot system to distract, mislead through deception, and engage potential cyber attackers. The primary research question to answer was: “How can AI-driven adaptive deception improve the effectiveness of honeypots in cybersecurity?” To address this, a high-interaction honeypot was developed on a HTML website to be perceived as a reverse shell, with the implementation of OpenAI’s GPT-4o model to respond, impersonating a Linux terminal, whilst silently tracking and logging the attacker, and classifying all commands into three sub-categories – Safe, Suspicious and Malicious. The core methods included command logging, AI-driven risk classification, dynamic fake filesystem manipulation, and the escalation of behaviour based on the attacker's actions. Attack simulations were performed by highly credible third-party cybersecurity experts to evaluate the honeypots effectiveness in engaging and tracking the attacker for as long as possible. The findings suggest that AI integration significantly improved the realism and engagement level of the honeypot, both in terms of enhancing intelligence gathering and the improvements from traditional static honeypots. However, full automation of behavioural escalation tuning remained an area to further explore. Overall, this study demonstrates that the integration of AI within traditional honeypot strategies can significantly enhance cyber defence systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corbett et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: