Assesses electoral system changes in Scottish Parliament, suggesting improvements for accountability.
This paper focuses on the Alternative Member System (AMS), sometimes referred to as a Mixed-Member PR (MMPR) electoral system, in which seventy-three members of the devolved Scottish Parliament (MSPs) are elected from single-member, simple plurality, Westminster-style constituencies and fifty-six from eight New Zealand or Germany-style regions. These arrangements are evaluated against general criteria for assessing electoral systems and the representativeness and accountability of regional-list MSPs in particular called into question. Ultimately, a case is made for a shift from the present closed and anonymized party list system for electing regional MSPs to a more personalized semi-open list system in which, in addition to the choice of casting an en bloc list ballot, there would be a single candidate preference option. This would be to implement the recommendation (4.66) of the 2006 Arbuthnott Commission without the need for major electoral surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Arter (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: