Comprehensive review identifies emerging biomarkers and their role in metastatic breast cancer management, suggesting precision oncology advancements.
Background/Objectives: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains a daunting clinical challenge, accounting for approximately 90% of all breast cancer-related deaths. The management of MBC has shifted from traditional chemotherapy to a sophisticated, biomarker-driven model of precision oncology. This evolution is predicated on the ability of biomarkers to provide prognostic and predictive information. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current landscape of biomarker testing in MBC, detailing which biomarkers to test and the clinical rationale for doing so. Methods: This is a comprehensive review based on current international clinical practice guidelines, peer-reviewed literature, and evidence regarding clinically actionable and emerging biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer. Results: Key biomarkers currently in routine use include the established estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2, alongside newer, clinically actionable alterations such as mutations in PIK3CA and ESR1, germline/somatic BRCA1/2, and PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), is rapidly gaining prominence as a non-invasive tool for real-time disease monitoring and resistance detection, highlighting the critical need for re-testing at metastasis due to tumor heterogeneity. Conclusions: The future of personalized oncology in MBC will be defined by the seamless integration of dynamic biomarkers and cutting-edge technologies. The integration of AI and spatial transcriptomics will move the field of pathology beyond a static diagnosis to a more dynamic and predictive model, reinforcing the pathologist’s role as the “molecular gatekeeper” for adaptive and personalized cancer care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: