Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study develops a digital entrepreneurship ecosystem index to assess conditions for entrepreneurship globally, highlighting regional insights.
Digitalization is profoundly reshaping the nature, scope and geography of entrepreneurship. In this study, the authors develop the concept of the digital entrepreneurship ecosystem (DEE) as a systemic framework to understand entrepreneurship in the digital age. Building on and extending prior work by Sussan and Acs (2017) and Song (2019), the authors provide a theoretical synthesis that integrates entrepreneurial ecosystem thinking with the logic of digital platforms, user participation and multiagency entrepreneurship. On this foundation, the authors construct a composite index – the DEE Index – covering 170 countries from 2017 to 2022. The index includes twelve pillars organized into four sub-indices: digital technology infrastructure, digital user citizenship, digital multisided platforms and digital technology entrepreneurship. Methodologically, the authors introduce a novel approach combining systemic interaction modeling, pooled normalization and a penalty for bottlenecks to account for structural weaknesses in ecosystems. The result is a multidimensional framework that offers rich insights for scholars and policymakers on the enabling conditions and constraints for digital entrepreneurship across different regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szerb et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: