Study derives weak interaction constant in theoretical physics, indicating high accuracy in predictions.
We derive the axial-vector coupling constant g_A of the weak interaction from first principles with zero free parameters, achieving g_A = 1.276165 vs. g_A(exp) = 1.2762 ± 0.0005 [PDG 2024], a deviation of 0.003% (0.07σ, i.e. 27 ppm). The only inputs are the prime number sequence, the number of spatial dimensions d=3, and the golden ratio φ = (1+√5)/2 (phase structure). The derivation proceeds in three levels. First, the architectural bifurcation theorem establishes that the weak channel P_W = {11, 13}, with N_W = 2.319 < d = 3, operates in the Hopf projection regime rather than the S³ mode-dilution regime used for electromagnetism and QCD. The tree-level coupling is g_A⁽⁰⁾ = |P_W|/Vol(Hopf) = 2/(π/2) = 4/π. A channel-specific self-energy from the local zeta function ζ11,13(-1) = -1/120 refines the denominator, giving g_A⁽¹⁾ = 2/(π/2 - C_W/N_W). Finally, a vertex correction of order (g_A·C_W)²/(6π) completes the derivation. The final formula is: g_A = 2/(π/2 - C_W/N_W) + (g_A·C_W)²/(2(|P_W|²-1)π) = 1.276165. The result extends the spectral correction programme of the companion papers (derivation of α to 0.06 ppb and α_s to 230 ppm) to the weak sector, using the same local zeta architecture restricted to the weak channel, but with a different geometric regime (Hopf vs. S³). A complete Python validation script reproducing all numerical results is provided in the appendix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frederic Requiere (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: