Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review quantifies efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, indicating its effectiveness in real-world settings.
Background: Guselkumab, a selective anti-IL-23p19 monoclonal antibody, has shown high efficacy in randomized trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence is essential to assess treatment performance in broader and more heterogeneous patient populations. Objectives: To synthesize the available real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis and PsA, and to quantify pooled clinical responses across clinically relevant follow-up windows. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for observational real-world studies of guselkumab in adults with psoriasis and/or PsA. Primary pooled outcomes were PASI 90 and PASI 100 in psoriasis and DAPSA < 14 in PsA. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a logit transformation. Cohort overlap was explicitly assessed and overlapping publications were not allowed to contribute concurrently to the same pooled estimate. Results: Thirty-four studies were included (29 psoriasis, 5 PsA). In psoriasis, pooled PASI 90 response rates were 50.8% (95% CI 46.8–54.8) at 12–16 weeks, 68.4% (95% CI 66.3–70.4) at 20–28 weeks, 71.2% (95% CI 64.9–76.8) at 36–60 weeks, and 77.1% (95% CI 74.9–79.3) at ≥96 weeks. Pooled PASI 100 response rates were 49.8% (95% CI 47.5–52.2) at 20–28 weeks and 49.7% (95% CI 47.1–52.3) at 36–60 weeks. In PsA, pooled DAPSA < 14 response rates were 56.9% (95% CI 23.0–85.3) at 20–28 weeks and 69.5% (95% CI 62.5–75.7) at 48–60 weeks. Safety reporting was heterogeneous, but serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: Real-world evidence supports guselkumab as an effective treatment for psoriasis and a clinically useful option for PsA, with a safety profile broadly consistent with the known trial experience. Interpretation remains limited by observational designs, heterogeneous denominators, and inconsistent safety reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodero-Anillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: