Randomized trial assesses perception performance and energy efficiency in multilingual UAV contexts, suggesting key insights for deployment.
Drone-based smart sensing increasingly relies on Vision–Language Models (VLMs) for real-time scene interpretation, obstacle detection, and autonomous navigation reasoning. Deploying such systems at scale demands not only high perceptual accuracy but also energy efficiency, a critical constraint on battery-powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms, and linguistic flexibility for multinational operational contexts. We present a systematic benchmarking framework that jointly evaluates perception performance and inference energy for five open-source VLMs across thirteen languages spanning six language families, including three low-resource varieties (Arabic, Basque, and Luxembourgish). Using imagery sampled from the Berkeley DeepDrive 10K (BDD10K), each model is evaluated on four sensing tasks of increasing difficulty scored via a sentence-transformer backbone, with energy measured following the AI Energy Score methodology (Wh per 1000 queries) through continuous NVML-based GPU power sampling. Across 65 language–model observations, LLaVA-1.6 achieves the highest perception score (S¯=0.160) while Phi-3-Vision attains the best energy efficiency (66.3 Wh/1000 queries); energy consumption and task accuracy are statistically uncorrelated (Spearman ρ=0.001; p=0.995). A formal UAV inference energy model instantiated for four commercial platforms confirms LLaVA-1.6 as Pareto-optimal on heavy-lift platforms (DJI Matrice 300/350 RTK) and LLaVA-1.5 on the energy-constrained Matrice 30; compact UAVs such as the Mavic 3 Enterprise exceed the budget of all evaluated models at standard query rates. Friedman tests reveal significant cross-language variability in energy demands (χ2=40.43; p=3.5×10−8) and navigation reasoning performance (χ2=13.35; p=0.010). Critically, we document a double penalty for low-resource languages, which simultaneously incur higher inference energy costs and lower task accuracy, with direct implications for equitable multilingual UAV deployments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtò et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: