Prospective observational study characterizes age-related phenotypes in acute myocardial infarction, indicating differentiated clinical implications.
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in younger adults represents a distinct clinical entity with biological features that may differ from those observed in later-onset disease. We aimed to characterize age-dependent clinical, inflammatory, lipid, and echocardiographic phenotypes and to explore their association with in-hospital adverse clinical events. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, age-stratified observational study conducted between 20 January 2024 and 20 January 2025, 90 patients with AMI undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were selected from 1051 AMI admissions: 30 aged 25–44 years and 60 aged ≥45 years. Admission biomarkers (including C-reactive protein, leukocyte-derived indices, and lipid parameters) and echocardiographic variables (left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain) were assessed, and exploratory receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed for in-hospital adverse clinical events. Results: Younger patients demonstrated a predominantly atherogenic profile, with higher smoking prevalence (63.3% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.001) and markedly higher lipoprotein(a) concentrations (76.18 ± 10.10 vs. 17.61 ± 11.42 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Older patients exhibited higher inflammatory indices (NLR and SII), higher hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP concentrations, and worse ventricular function. STEMI predominated in both age groups (83.3% in each), and infarct localization did not differ significantly between younger and older patients. The rate of in-hospital adverse clinical events was numerically higher in older patients (18.3% vs. 10.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant. In exploratory ROC analyses, CRP (AUC = 0.874) and LVEF (AUC = 0.868) showed the highest discriminatory performance. Conclusions: AMI appears to manifest through age-related baseline phenotypes: a more atherogenic/thrombotic profile in younger patients and a more inflammatory/ventricular dysfunction profile in older patients. CRP and LVEF emerged as the strongest exploratory discriminators of in-hospital adverse clinical events, but these findings require validation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tudurachi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: