Narrative review highlights evidence-based strategies for selecting b/tsDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting implications for patient care.
INTRODUCTION: Biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) have transformed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management; however, individualizing treatment, balancing efficacy and safety remains challenging. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review summarized evidence guiding b/tsDMARD selection based on a literature search conducted in PubMed. First, we outlined efficacy-driven factors, including concomitant csDMARD use, serological markers, and C-reactive protein/interleukin-6-related pathways, that may support selecting particular mechanisms of action. Second, we discussed safety-oriented prescriptions in the context of heart failure, demyelinating disease, infection, malignancy. Third, we addressed organ-specific comorbidities, including interstitial lung disease, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and renal impairment. These comorbidities require proactive management and appropriate control of RA activity. We reviewed emerging evidence on difficult-to-treat RA, including registry findings suggesting beneficial therapies for patients with multi-drug refractory synovitis. EXPERT OPINION: Precision pharmacotherapy in RA requires cautious interpretation of complex 'precision medicine' studies, with close attention to study populations, reproducibility. We believe optimal care combines treat-to-target principles, structured safety screening, and shared decision-making. This approach uses comorbidity-based risk stratification to define safe options and then chooses among them based on expected efficacy. Long-term registry experience indicates that such a balanced strategy can reduce adverse events while maintaining high drug retention and remission rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonomoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: