PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 24, 2014Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society461 citationsOpen Access

Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

View Full Paper
RHRobert K. HeatonNANatacha AkshoomoffDTDavid S. Tulsky

Structured PICO

Does the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery demonstrate reliability and validity compared to gold standard measures in healthy adults?

P
Population
268 self-described healthy adults, age 20-85 years, recruited at four university-based sites using stratified sampling for age, gender, education, and ethnicity.
I
Intervention
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB)
C
Comparator
Corresponding gold standard validation measures
O
Outcome
Reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (convergent, discriminant, external) of the Composite Scoressurrogate

The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Composite Scores demonstrate excellent reliability and validity, supporting their use in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

Abstract

This study describes psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) Composite Scores in an adult sample. The NIHTB-CB was designed for use in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for ages 3 to 85. A total of 268 self-described healthy adults were recruited at four university-based sites, using stratified sampling guidelines to target demographic variability for age (20-85 years), gender, education, and ethnicity. The NIHTB-CB contains seven computer-based instruments assessing five cognitive sub-domains: Language, Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Processing Speed, and Working Memory. Participants completed the NIHTB-CB, corresponding gold standard validation measures selected to tap the same cognitive abilities, and sociodemographic questionnaires. Three Composite Scores were derived for both the NIHTB-CB and gold standard batteries: "Crystallized Cognition Composite," "Fluid Cognition Composite," and "Total Cognition Composite" scores. NIHTB Composite Scores showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas=0.84 Crystallized, 0.83 Fluid, 0.77 Total), excellent test-retest reliability (r: 0.86-0.92), strong convergent (r: 0.78-0.90) and discriminant (r: 0.19-0.39) validities versus gold standard composites, and expected age effects (r=0.18 crystallized, r=-0.68 fluid, r=-0.26 total). Significant relationships with self-reported prior school difficulties and current health status, employment, and presence of a disability provided evidence of external validity. The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Composite Scores have excellent reliability and validity, suggesting they can be used effectively in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heaton et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04c3378cb8b3492fad3ebchttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617714000241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LibGuides: Assessment Tools: Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults2011 · 655 citations
  2. 2Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence1967 · 1,352 citations
  3. 3Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox2013 · 1,340 citations
  4. 4The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary Clinical Validity1998 · 2,574 citations
  5. 5Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications2001 · 1,045 citations