Key result
Women had slightly lower risk-standardized rates of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction than men (40.3% vs. 41.9%, P<0.001), primarily among patients with equivocal indications.
Why the study?
Does female sex reduce the rate of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction compared to male sex?
Observational (n=143,444)
Yes
Does female sex reduce the rate of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction compared to male sex?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.3% vs 41.9%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Sex differences in cardiac catheterization rates post-AMI are largely attenuated after adjusting for clinical factors and appropriateness, with no significant difference among patients with strong indications.
Residual differences mainly in equivocal cases should not yet change practice; leaves open whether they reflect bias or appropriate judgment.
BACKGROUND: Many studies have found that women are less likely than men to have cardiac catheterization after an acute myocardial infarction; however, it is unknown whether sex differences reflect inappropriate treatment. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether cardiac catheterization use after acute myocardial infarction in men and women varied by sex and the appropriateness of the procedure, as determined by clinical guidelines. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of chart-abstracted data. SETTING: U.S. acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS: 143 444 Medicare patients who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction between 1994 and 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Cardiac catheterization use within 60 days of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Women had lower crude rates of cardiac catheterization than men (35.7% for women vs. 46.5% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 10.8 percentage points). Multivariable adjustment for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics reduced most of the sex differences in procedure use (risk-standardized rates, 40.3% for women vs. 41.9% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 1.6 percentage points). Sex differences in cardiac catheterization use varied by the appropriateness of the procedure. Risk-standardized rates of cardiac catheterization were similar for men and women with strong indications for the procedure (44.1% for women vs. 44.6% for men [ P > 0.2]; difference, 0.5 percentage point). Rates of cardiac catheterization use among patients with weak indications did not significantly differ between men and women (16.5% for women vs. 18.0% for men [ P = 0.096]; difference, 1.5 percentage points). Sex differences in cardiac catheterization use were largest for patients with equivocal indications (39.4% for women vs. 42.5% for men [ P < 0.001]; difference, 3.1 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly persons, women have lower rates of cardiac catheterization use after an acute myocardial infarction than men. However, this difference was attenuated after multivariable adjustment, and it occurred primarily in patients with equivocal indications. We found no sex variations in procedure use among patients who had strong indications for cardiac catheterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rathore et al. (2002) conducted an observational in acute myocardial infarction (n=143,444). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Cardiac catheterization use within 60 days of hospitalization (p=< 0.001). Women had slightly lower risk-standardized rates of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction than men (40.3% vs. 41.9%, P<0.001), primarily among patients with equivocal indications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: