Key result
Acute coronary syndrome following TAVR occurred in 2.75% of patients and was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without ACS (9.6% vs 3.4%; p<.001).
Why the study?
The incidence and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome immediately following transcatheter aortic valve replacement remained largely unknown.
Does the development of acute coronary syndrome following TAVR worsen in-hospital clinical outcomes?
Cohort (n=48,454)
Yes
Does the development of acute coronary syndrome following TAVR worsen in-hospital clinical outcomes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In-hospital ACS following TAVR is uncommon (2.75%) but is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes, including a nearly threefold increase in in-hospital mortality.
BACKGROUND: Incidence and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) immediately following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of ACS following TAVR. METHODS: We queried the National Readmission Database from January 2012 to September 2015 for TAVR admissions with and without ACS, creating a propensity-matched cohort to compare outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 48,454 patients underwent TAVR, with 1,332 (2.75%) developing ACS. TAVR patients with ACS compared to those without ACS had a significantly higher incidence of acute kidney injury (24.7 vs. 19.2%; p = .001), ischemic stroke (3.7 vs. 2.3%; p = .04), vascular complications (8.6 vs. 5.8%; p = .008), cardiogenic shock (9.8 vs. 1.9%; p < .001), cardiac arrest (5.1 vs. 2.8%; p = .002), mechanical circulatory support (8.1 vs. 1.5%; p < .001), and in-hospital mortality (9.6 vs. 3.4%; p < .001). Additionally, TAVR with ACS had longer lengths of stay (median 10 days vs. 6 days; p < .001) and hospital charges (median $23,200 vs. $19,000; p < .001). Positive predictors of ACS were history of PCI (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI: 1.25-1.63), hyperlipidemia (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.34), chronic blood loss anemia (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI: 1.54-3.03), chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04-1.31), fluid and electrolyte disorders (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI: 1.47-1.85), and weight loss (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI: 1.22-1.91). Heart failure (34%) was the most common reason for readmission in the ACS cohort. CONCLUSION: ACS after TAVR is uncommon but is associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare resource utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazir et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=48,454). TAVR with acute coronary syndrome vs. TAVR without acute coronary syndrome was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<.001). Acute coronary syndrome following TAVR occurred in 2.75% of patients and was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without ACS (9.6% vs 3.4%; p<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: