Why the study?
Patients with severe aortic stenosis experience repeat hospitalizations for multiple conditions, prompting evaluation of the effect of TAVR on hospitalizations.
Does TAVR alter hospital resource utilization (hospitalizations and costs) in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to the pre-TAVR period?
Population
15,324 patients at 328 sites undergoing TAVR with Medicare linkage
Comparison
Post-TAVR vs pre-TAVR (year pre-TAVR and post-TAVR)
Design
Registry-based cohort study linked to Medicare claims
Follow-up
1 year post-TAVR
Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations (RR 0.87, p<0.01) but increased all-cause and noncardiovascular hospitalizations compared to pre-TAVR.
Authors
Loading...
TAVR may lower HF hospitalizations and costs in severe AS; leaves open net resource impact across broader real-world populations.
Cohort (n=15,324)
Yes
Does TAVR alter hospital resource utilization (hospitalizations and costs) in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to the pre-TAVR period?
Relative Risk: 0.87
p-value: p=<0.01
TAVR reduces heart failure hospitalizations and overall inpatient costs but is associated with increased all-cause, noncardiovascular, and bleeding hospitalizations in the year following the procedure.
Vemulapalli et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=15,324). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Pre-TAVR period was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization rates (RR 0.87, p=<0.01). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations (RR 0.87, p<0.01) but increased all-cause and noncardiovascular hospitalizations compared to pre-TAVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: