Key result
Higher intensity GDMT is linked to ~52% lower mortality in acute ischemic heart failure.
Why the study?
The impact of guideline-directed medical therapy for coronary heart disease in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure is unknown.
Does higher intensity of guideline-directed medical therapy for coronary disease reduce mortality in patients hospitalized with acute ischemic heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,873)
Does higher intensity of guideline-directed medical therapy for coronary disease reduce mortality in patients hospitalized with acute ischemic heart failure?
Increasing the intensity of guideline-directed medical therapy for coronary heart disease is associated with lower mortality in patients with acute ischemic heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction.
May warrant higher GDMT intensity in acute ischemic HF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE: The impact of guideline-directed medical therapy for coronary heart disease in those hospitalized with acute heart failure is unknown. METHODS: We studied guideline-directed medical therapies for coronary disease: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, and statins. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting the propensity score, we examined associations of guideline-directed medical therapy intensity (categorized as low [0-1], high [2-3], or very high [4] number of drugs) with mortality in 1873 patients with angina, troponin elevation, or prior myocardial infarction. RESULTS: At discharge, 0-1, 2-3, and 4 medications were prescribed in 467 (25%), 705 (38%), and 701 (37%) patients, respectively. Relative to those prescribed 0-1 drugs (reference), all-cause mortality was lower with 2-3 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.84, P = 0.009) or all 4 drug classes (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96, P = 0.034) over 181-365 days, with similar reductions present from 0-180 days. In those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, mortality trended lower with 2-3 drug classes (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.02, P = 0.054) and was significantly reduced with 4 drugs (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.84, P = 0.021) during 0-180 day follow-up. In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, all-cause mortality was reduced during both 0-180 and 181-365 days when discharged on 2-3 (HR 0.30 for 181-365 days, 95%CI 0.14-0.64, P = 0.002) or all 4 drug classes (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19-0.95, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing guideline-directed medical therapy intensity for coronary heart disease resulted in lower mortality in patients with acute ischemic heart failure with both preserved and reduced ejection fractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crosier et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure with coronary heart disease (n=1,873). High intensity guideline-directed medical therapy (2-3 or 4 drug classes) vs. Low intensity therapy (0-1 drug classes) was evaluated on All-cause mortality over 181-365 days (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.84, p=0.009). Higher intensity of guideline-directed medical therapy (2-3 drug classes) reduced all-cause mortality compared to 0-1 classes in acute ischemic heart failure (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.84; P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: