Key result
Percutaneous LAAO shows lower-than-expected thromboembolic risk with ~6 major bleeds per 100 patient-years.
Why the study?
The study sought to obtain long-term patient outcomes after successful percutaneous LAAO in everyday clinical practice.
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) prevent stroke and reduce bleeding compared to expected rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=218)
No
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) prevent stroke and reduce bleeding compared to expected rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Long-term (10-year) follow-up of successful LAAO shows thromboembolic event rates remain lower than expected, supporting its long-term efficacy for stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF.
Long-term LAAO may sustain thromboembolic protection in nonvalvular AF; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation of net benefit.
Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT). Objective: The study sought to obtain long-term patient outcomes after successful LAAO in everyday clinical practice. Methods: -VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol) scores. Furthermore, anticoagulation and antiplatelet use during follow-up was evaluated. Results: -VASc predicted event rate. Device-related thrombus was observed in 5 (2%) patients. Sixty-five nonprocedural major bleeding complications occurred in 24 (11%) of 218 patients with a rate of 5.7 per 100-patient years, which is comparable to estimated HAS-BLED-bleeding rates under OAT use. At end of follow-up 71% of all patients were on single antiplatelet or no antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment, while 29% were on OAT. Conclusion: Thromboembolic event rates during long-term follow-up after successful LAAO remained consistently lower than expected supporting the efficacy of LAAO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maarse et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=218). Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) vs. Expected event rates based on risk scores was evaluated on Thromboembolic event rates and major bleeding complications. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion resulted in lower than expected thromboembolic event rates and a major bleeding rate of 5.7 per 100-patient years over long-term follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: