Key result
cfPWV links to ~7% greater cIMT risk per m/s, showing a stronger association than baPWV.
Why the study?
Limited studies have systematically compared the relationships between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) with increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT).
Are cfPWV and baPWV associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in a Chinese community-based population?
Cohort (n=6,026)
Are cfPWV and baPWV associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in a Chinese community-based population?
Effect estimate: OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02-1.11)
Both cfPWV and baPWV are associated with increased cIMT, but cfPWV is a stronger indicator of increased cIMT than baPWV in a Chinese community-based population.
May favor cfPWV over baPWV for arterial stiffness assessment in community cohorts; extends comparative data but should not yet change practice.
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) act as two most frequently applied indicators to evaluate arterial stiffness. Limited studies have systematically compared the relationships between cfPWV/baPWV and increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). This study aimed to investigate the associations of the two PWV indices with cIMT in a Chinese community-based population. A total of 6026 Chinese participants from an atherosclerosis cohort were included in our analysis. Increased cIMT was defined as the maximum of cIMT > 0.9 mm in end-systolic period of carotid artery. Mean (SD) cfPWV and baPWV were 8.55±1.83 and 16.79±3.35 m/s, respectively. The prevalence of increased cIMT was 59.58%. In multivariable logistic regression, both PWVs were independently associated with increased cIMT after adjustment for various confounders (for 1 m/s increase of cfPWV: OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11; for 1 m/s increase of baPWV: OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). The highest cfPWV and baPWV quartile groups had higher prevalence of increased cIMT when compared with the lowest quartile groups (for cfPWV: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.55; for baPWV: OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.50). However, when both PWVs were added into multivariable model simultaneously, only cfPWV was associated with odds of increased cIMT. Subgroup analyses further showed cfPWV was more strongly associated with increased cIMT than baPWV in males, participants aged ≥65 years, and those with other cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, both cfPWV and baPWV are associated with increased cIMT in a Chinese community-based population. Furthermore, cfPWV is more strongly correlated with increased cIMT compared to baPWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Increased carotid intima-media thickness (n=6,026). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) vs. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was evaluated on Increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT > 0.9 mm) (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was more strongly associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness than brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.11 per 1 m/s increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: