Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The in vitro antibacterial activity of a series of phosphanegold(I) dithiocarbamates, R3PAu[S2CN(iPr)CH2CH2OH] where R = Ph (2), Cy (3) and Et (4), against 25 strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were determined through the disk diffusion method, the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and by time-kill assay. Compounds 2 and 3 have been shown to be specifically active against the tested Gram-positive bacteria, with MIC values ranging from 7.81 to 125 μg/ml. Compound 4 has a broad-spectrum activity against 24 strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, with MIC values ranging from 0.98 to 1,000 μg/ml. Noteworthy was that 4, with a very low MIC value of 0.98 μg/ml, is particularly effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Bacillus sp., as effective as the standard antibiotic ciprofloxacin. In time-kill studies, the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of the tested compounds towards susceptible strains were similar to their characteristics determined by MBC/MIC ratios. In the time-kill assay, 2 and 3 showed only bactericidal activity towards the susceptible strains tested, whereas 4 revealed varying degrees of bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities, results indicating different antibacterial mechanisms are involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sim et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: