Key result
Short device-detected SCAF episodes carry a ~2-fold higher stroke risk versus no SCAF.
Why the study?
Does continuous monitoring by implanted cardiac electronic devices detect subclinical atrial fibrillation and predict stroke risk?
Does continuous monitoring by implanted cardiac electronic devices detect subclinical atrial fibrillation and predict stroke risk?
Continuous monitoring via implanted cardiac devices detects subclinical atrial fibrillation, which is associated with a 2.2-3.1 fold increased risk of stroke, informing strategies for stroke prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Device-detected SCAF may warrant closer surveillance; leaves open whether anticoagulation improves outcomes without randomized trials.
Nearly one out of five strokes is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial fibrillation is often intermittent and asymptomatic. Detection of AF after cryptogenic stroke will likely change therapy from antiplatelet to oral anticoagulation agents for secondary stroke prevention. A critical step is to convert 'covert' AF into electrocardiogram documented AF. External rhythm recording devices have registered a high incidence of AF to occur after a cryptogenic stroke, but are limited by short duration of continuous recordings. Invasive cardiac monitoring using insertable leadless cardiac monitors are sensitive means to identify subclinical AF (SCAF) after cryptogenic stroke, and AF has been reported to occur in 8.9% of these patients by 6 months in one study. It will be more attractive to identify SCAF before a stroke occurs. Recent series in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients showed that short episodes of SCAF increased stroke risk, with odds ratio ∼2.2-3.1 compared with those without SCAF recorded. However, temporal sequence of recorded SCAF and stroke occurrence was uncertain, and the overall stroke risk was lower compared with patients with clinical AF at similar risk scores. This article reviews the incidence and clinical role of using implanted devices to detect SCAF and discusses the implication of SCAF so detected in primary and secondary stroke prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2015) conducted a review in Subclinical atrial fibrillation and stroke. Implanted cardiac electronic devices vs. No subclinical atrial fibrillation recorded was evaluated on Stroke risk (OR ~2.2-3.1). Short episodes of subclinical atrial fibrillation detected by implanted cardiac electronic devices increased stroke risk compared with patients without recorded SCAF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: