Key result
In a European registry of patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation was used in over 80% of eligible patients, and 78.6% achieved adequate rate control.
Observational (n=7,243)
Yes
The management of atrial fibrillation in Europe in 2012 largely adhered to the 2010 ESC guidelines, with high rates of oral anticoagulation and adequate rate control.
AIMS: We sought to describe the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Europe after the release of the 2010 AF Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PREFER in AF registry enrolled consecutive patients with AF from January 2012 to January 2013 in 461 centres in seven European countries. Seven thousand two hundred and forty-three evaluable patients were enrolled, aged 71.5 ± 11 years, 60.1% male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.4 ± 1.8 (mean ± standard deviation). Thirty per cent patients had paroxysmal, 24.0% had persistent, 7.2% had long-standing persistent, and 38.8% had permanent AF. Oral anticoagulation was used in the majority of patients: 4799 patients (66.3%) received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) as mono-therapy, 720 patients a combination of VKA and antiplatelet agents (9.9%), 442 patients (6.1%) a new oral anticoagulant drugs (NOAC). Antiplatelet agents alone were given to 808 patients (11.2%), no antithrombotic therapy to 474 patients (6.5%). Of 7034 evaluable patients, 5530 (78.6%) patients were adequately rate controlled (mean heart rate 60-100 bpm). Half of the patients (50.7%) received rhythm control therapy by electrical cardioversion (18.1%), pharmacological cardioversion (19.5%), antiarrhythmic drugs (amiodarone 24.1%, flecainide or propafenone 13.5%, sotalol 5.5%, dronedarone 4.0%), and catheter ablation (5.0%). CONCLUSION: The management of AF patients in 2012 has adapted to recent evidence and guideline recommendations. Oral anticoagulant therapy with VKA (majority) or NOACs is given to over 80% of eligible patients, including those at risk for bleeding. Rate is often adequately controlled, and rhythm control therapy is widely used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirchhof et al. (2013) conducted an observational in atrial fibrillation (n=7,243). Guideline-directed management of atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Management practices including antithrombotic therapy, rate control, and rhythm control. In a European registry of patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation was used in over 80% of eligible patients, and 78.6% achieved adequate rate control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: